Stable Jack
  • Introduction to Stable Jack
    • Introduction to Stable Jack
    • Why Do the Markets Need Stable Jack?
    • The Mechanism Behind Stable Jack
      • Technical Explanation of the Mechanism
  • Stable Jack v2
    • Why We're Building Stable Jack v2
    • Introduction to Yield Token (YT)
    • Introduction to Volatility Token (VT)
    • Introduction to Points Token (PT)
    • New Features Coming with the v2
    • Competitor Analysis
    • What Use Cases does Stable Jack offer?
    • How Stable Jack Creates New Demand: The BENQI Case Study
    • Risk Management
    • Additional Information
  • Audits
  • Stable Jack v1
    • Stable Jack v1
      • System Stability
      • Risk Management
        • Level 1 - Stability Mode Mint/Redeem Controls
        • Level 2 - Rebalance Pool
        • Counter-Party Risk Management
      • Calculations
      • FAQ
        • The Difference Between aUSD and UST
      • Contract Adresses
  • $JACK Tokenomics
    • The Death of Airdrops: Discount Tickets as a New Paradigm
      • The Solution: Discount Tickets
      • The Case for Discount Tickets
      • Comparison: Discount Tickets vs Airdrops?
    • $JACK Token
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Stable Jack v1
  2. Stable Jack v1

System Stability

There needs to be sufficient xAVAX supply for the system to operate correctly and constrain the volatility of the aUSD NAV. As stated, a convenient way to think about the system’s ability to do this is to consider the entire system as one big CDP:

The total AVAX reserve represents the total CDP collateral. The total aUSD supply represents the borrowed amount, and the xAVAX supply represents the difference between supplied collateral and the total borrowed amount.

Viewed through this lens, we can measure the health of the system in a similar way as a CDP, using the collateralization ratio. Another way to state that the system requires sufficient xAVAX supply is to say it requires a CR over 100% to function correctly.

The CR is calculated as the value of the AVAX reserve divided by the value of the aUSD supply, multiplied by 100%. Example 1

Metric
Value

AVAX price

$20

Total reserve market cap

200 AVAX - $40,000

aUSD market cap

$28,000

xAVAX market cap

$12,000

CR (Collateral Ratio)

142.85%

Example 2

Metric
Value

AVAX price

$20

Total reserve market cap

200 AVAX - $40,000

aUSD market cap

$22,000

xAVAX market cap

$18,000

CR (Collateral Ratio)

181.8%

Minting aUSD or xAVAX, as well as adjusting the NAV of either token will have an impact on the CR. If the system CR were ever to fall to 100%, that would imply that the NAV of xAVAX would be zero, so it can be seen as liquidation.

On the other hand, while aUSD would remain mintable and redeemable, its Δ would jump to 1, meaning it would be exposed to the full price movements of AVAX (i.e. no longer be a stablecoin). The protocol has a risk management module that kicks in if the CR falls too low, to help ensure that does not happen. Note: As long as CR > 100%, aUSD can be kept to Δ=0.

PreviousStable Jack v1NextRisk Management

Last updated 8 months ago